| The Chindera | ||||||
| On Saturday morning the 10th of September 1895, the twin screw, timber steamer “Chindera”, was launched into the calm waters of Currambene Creek Jervis Bay, by ship builder Mr. G, W. Hardman, who was one of the shipbuilders working along the shores of Currambene Creek Huskisson in the late 1800’s, along side the Dent family of ship builders.
Specially built for the Tweed River passenger and cargo trade for the Nicoll’s Line, the new steamer was built exceptionally strong and will carry 180 tons on a easy draught. |
||||||
| Saturday 29th November 1895. Trial trip goes well. After being fitted out the Chindera made her trial trip with Mr. Nicoll and a large party of friends and recorded a speed of over nine knots, which was considered highly satisfactory. The Chindera is nicely fitted up for passengers, and on Saturday afternoon dressed in bunting from deck to masthead, she looked extremely smart. |
||||||
| Wednesday 9th September 1896 Chindera aground on the Tweed Heads Bar. Almost exactly 12 months after her celebrated launch, the Chindera was aground on the Tweed River spit just inside the bar. First Report’s of the disaster.
Marine board enquiry. |
||||||
Another witness, named Aksel Rossendahl, also a seaman on the Chindera, gave corroborative evidence regarding the vessel’s bad steering qualities. |
||||||
| Sourced from Community based heritage study – Tweed Shire Council |
||||||
The pilot was subjected to a lengthy cross examination, with a view of showing that the depth of water in the south channel was less than the draught of the Chindera. |
||||||
Captain Pearson, was recalled on his former oath.
Marine Boards final judgment. After reading certificates as to character, the board decided to suspend Pearson’s foreign going certificate for a period of three months. Pearson applied for a first mate’s certificate, which was granted to him. |
||||||
Chindera a danger to navigation.
|
||||||
Chindera to be blow up.
Monday 5th October 1896. The end of another vessel built built at Huskisson. |
||||||
| Vessels Specs. Chindera – 186 tons. Lbd: 118′ x 20’8″ x 9’7″. Wooden steamship of 35 horsepower, 2 masts schooner rigged, Built by H Hardman. |
||||||
| “Stand off” As I have been researching these stories involving ships wrecked trying to enter a harbour or river mouth, I keep coming across a reference to the “stand off signal flag” being displayed by harbour pilots, as a warning signal to ship captains, – do not enter the harbour or cross the bar until otherwise advised. I thought it would be good to have an image of the flag to go along with this story, I thought with a bit of work Id find the image easily, but that wasn’t the case. Despite extensive research, at this time I’m unable to find an image or for that matter any reference to the words “Stand off” signal at all, the closest international signal is the one below meaning, “you should stop your vessel instantly” It seems flags that were flying then, may not be in existence now, or may have a different meaning, the research continues. Id like to thank Tony Burton from Flags Australia and Andrew Brown from the Naval Reserve, for their assistance. |
||||||
Sourced from Community based heritage study – Tweed Shire Council |
||||||
| The most important signal for the masters of vessels approaching the port was to convey information about the state of the tide. McGregor devised a system of flags to show whether the tide was flooding or ebbing. Then he needed to convey to the vessel if it was safe to cross the bar. In rough conditions he would fly a ‘stand off’ flag signal, to warn the vessel to anchor, usually in Danger Bay, under the lee of Point Danger headland. Sourced from Community based heritage study – Tweed Shire Council |
||||||
| Andrew Brown’s continued input. 28th Jan 2015 The ‘stand off’ signal would have been flown from or very close to the Tweed Heads Signal Station near, but not necessarily at, Point Danger (they would know the location). There is probably a record up there of the specific signal it use to fly – don’t be surprised if the one referred to in the report as ’the stand off signal” is not in fact called the ‘stand off’ signal. It might well be described as ‘Harbour Closed’, ‘Bar Heavy’ or similar as ‘stand off’ is a bit too generic. |